Image source: Pexels.com

The act of consuming human flesh or internal organs is known as cannibalism. Throughout history, many civilizations have engaged in it for a variety of reasons, including survival, ritual, taboo, or curiosity. However, because most modern communities view cannibalism as unethical, repulsive, and hazardous, it is also generally denounced and outlawed.

I’ll go over a few of the moral and legal dilemmas that cannibalism in the US raises in this blog post. In addition, I’ll give some notable instances of cannibalism in American history and society.

Why Do Human Flesh Eaters Do It?

Eating human flesh can be motivated by a variety of factors, including:

• Hunger: When faced with starvation or the lack of other food sources, some humans may turn to cannibalism.
• Survival: When shipwrecked at sea or in isolated places without access to civilization, some people may turn to cannibalism as a means of subsistence.
• Ritual: As a way to pay respect to their gods or ancestors, some people turn to cannibalism as a religious or cultural ritual.
• Taboo: As a means of rebelling against societal expectations or breaching social standards, some people may turn to cannibalism.
• Curiosity: Some people may turn to cannibalism due to a passion with science.

What Ethical Issues Does Cannibalism Raise?

Numerous moral dilemmas posed by cannibalism cast doubt on our moral standards and beliefs. Among these inquiries are:

Is it ethical to murder someone else so they can have food?

The worth of human life and the respect for human dignity are at stake in this discussion. It may be argued that killing another person for food violates their right to life and shows little regard for their dignity as a human being.

Is it ethically OK to consume the remains of a former friend or relative?

Respect for human emotions and the importance of human connections are at issue in this question. Eating a person who was formerly a friend or family member could be interpreted as a betrayal of their confidence.

Is it ethical to consume the body of another person who has given their consent?

The importance of human autonomy and respect for personal preferences are at stake in this discussion. Eating someone who gave their permission to be eaten could be interpreted as honoring their request and showing respect for their choice.

Is it morally OK to consume a deceased person’s remains?

Respect for human rights and the importance of human justice are at issue in this question. Eating a person who was slain by another person could be interpreted as a violation of that person’s rights and a role in their murder.

Is it ethical to consume a human being who has a parasite or disease?

The importance of maintaining human health and safety are at stake in this discussion. Eating a person who has a parasite or sickness may be viewed as a risk to one’s own health and a disrespect for personal safety.

The answers to these queries may vary throughout ethical frameworks. As an illustration:

According to the utilitarian idea, the best course of action is the one that maximizes happiness and reduces suffering for the largest number of individuals. This hypothesis suggests that if consuming human flesh results in more lives saved than lost, then it might be justified.
According to deontology, the morally correct course of conduct is the one that complies with moral obligations, regardless of the repercussions. In keeping with this theory,

Eating human flesh may be immoral since it infringes upon the autonomy and dignity of others.
Virtue ethics: According to this theory, the morally correct course of conduct is the one that demonstrates particular virtues or qualities of character. This hypothesis suggests that eating human flesh might be morally repugnant as it demonstrates a lack of empathy and regard for other people.

What Effects Does Cannibalism Have on the Law?

Numerous legal concerns related to cannibalism also affect our rights and obligations as citizens. Among these concerns are:

• Consent: Whether the person being eaten has given their informed consent is one of the main legal questions surrounding cannibalism. Consent is a key factor in assessing whether an action is lawful or not in any civilized culture. It is crucial to take into account if the victim of cannibalism understood what they were committing to before they passed away.
• Murder: Whether killing someone for food qualifies as murder is a major legal question surrounding cannibalism. Murder is defined as the unlawful taking of a life with premeditation and malice. The majority of US jurisdictions demand proof beyond a reasonable doubt that there was premeditation (knowing) and intent (malice) behind the deadly act (killing). Therefore, unless there is proof that the victim was slain with malice aforethought, eating someone who was killed by someone else does not always equal murder.
• Burial: Whether the right funeral customs were observed after death is a major legal question concerning cannibalism. States have different burial regulations, but in general, unless there are exceptional circumstances, bodies must be interred within 24 hours of death (such as decomposition). Incorrect burial practices may lead to penalties or jail time.

What Are Some Famous Cases Involving Cannibalism in American History?

There have been reports of cannibalism involving American characters in a number of historical circumstances. Here are a few instances:

The Party of Donner

About 184 emigrants, known as the Donner Party, were stranded by snow close to South Pass during the winter of 1846–1847 while trying to reach California along the Oregon Trail because they were running low on food. When they ran out of other options, they turned to devouring the flesh of their own dead colleagues.

Dahmer Jeffrey

Jeffrey Dahmer was an American serial murderer who murdered 17 men and boys between 1978 and 1991. He also mutilated, cooked, and ate pieces of his victims. After one of his planned victims fled and informed the authorities, he was taken into custody. He was given a life sentence and was murdered in 1994 by another prisoner.

Armin Meiwes

Armin Meiwes was a German computer technician who killed and ate a consenting victim in 2001. Through an online community for fans of cannibalism, he got to know Bernd Brandes, his victim. Meiwes, who was filming the entire thing on camera, convinced Brandes to be slaughtered and eaten. Meiwes was taken into custody following his online promotion of a different victim. After being found guilty of both manslaughter and murder, he is currently receiving a life sentence.

In summary

The contentious and intricate subject of cannibalism raises moral and legal questions. Determining the morality of cannibalism is a challenging task since diverse viewpoints may present disparate justifications and standards. Nonetheless, it’s critical to respect other people’s rights and values and to be conscious of the problems and repercussions that cannibalism brings with it.

culture ethics history law

Ghazala Siddique